A 32-bit operating system can only support up to 4GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4GB, giving increased performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit apps. Has integrated graphics. HiSilicon Kirin 710. Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. With integrated graphics you don't need to buy a separate graphics card. Pros of Samsung Exynos 1380. Performs 2.6x better in floating-point computations. Announced 3-years and 9-months later. Supports 61% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 31.78 GB/s) Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm) Shows better (up to 34%) AnTuTu 10 score - 595K vs 444K. Higher GPU frequency (~16%) Benchmarks. Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810. 34.2 pt (60%) Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T -69% Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G -11% Performs 12.7x better in floating-point computations. Has 3 MB larger L3 cache size than the Kirin 710. Shows significantly better (up to 3.5x) AnTuTu 10 score - 887K vs 251K. Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 12 nm) Announced 2-years and 5-months later. 29% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2200 MHz) Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835. Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (29.8 against 14.9 GB/s) Performs 48% better in floating-point computations. Shows better (up to 22%) AnTuTu 10 score - 363K vs 298K. 11% higher CPU clock speed (2450 vs 2200 MHz) We compared the 4-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 (Adreno 530) with the newer 8-core HiSilicon Kirin 710 (Mali-G51 MP4) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios. Snapdragon 710. 298826. Kirin 820 +66%. 496464. CPU. Kirin 710. We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio P22 (with PowerVR GE8320 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 710 (Mali-G51 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. Review. 9t4HIl.